Thanks to the support of CEI, and NeighborWorks, Maine Broadband Coalition is happy to present this video that beautifully demonstrates the impact high speed broadband can have on Maine’s rural communities. Please share widely!
Thanks to the support of CEI, and NeighborWorks, Maine Broadband Coalition is happy to present this video that beautifully demonstrates the impact high speed broadband can have on Maine’s rural communities. Please share widely!
During last week’s Special Legislative Session we witnessed a systemic failure in our political system to make a necessary investment in Maine’s future. The Legislature’s inability to secure a 2/3 majority to approve a $15M bond for providing high-speed internet access to all Mainers- no matter where you live – is a failure that should not be acceptable in a modern economy.
While it might be easy to chalk up the lack of action to purely politics – the reality
is that fewer than 2/3rds our state representatives don’t understand that investments in broadband infrastructure are as critical to our economy and quality of life as our roads and bridges. High-speed internet enables our law enforcement to protect our communities; our small businesses to thrive and create new jobs; our parents to age in place and visit their doctor with out a long drive; and our children to do their homework without sitting in-front of a closed library.
We need to double down our efforts of mobilizing every community in the state to demand equal access to opportunity, health, and safety through expanding investments in broadband infrastructure. All of us – especially community broadband advocates represented via the Maine Broadband Coalition need to ensure that our voice is heard and our needs honored.
We can draw inspiration from our partners like Charlie Woodworth at The Greater Franklin Development Corporation whom have spent the last several years assembling and stacking a comprehensive community plan with buy in and participation at all levels. Or from the work facilitated by Maine West fusing digital literacy and infrastructure expansion over a vast geographic area. These are just a few examples of communities around the state that are doing inspiring work around a complex and nuanced issue.
Where there is failure – there is also opportunity. That opportunity is to build from the strengths of Coalition partners to demonstrate – demand – and develop the modern broadband infrastructure that Maine residents, businesses and institutions deserve. This is an opportunity to broaden our coalition and build connections with other groups of people for whom broadband would provide significant benefits. It is more important than ever that we use this recent setback as a springboard toward getting the resources necessary to provide reliable, affordable high-speed internet to every community in Maine.
Let’s not be derailed by this temporary, short-sighted, delay in investing in our broadband infrastructure that perpetuates an unnecessary digital divide. It is now more important than ever Maine Broadband Coalition continue to serve as a resource for communities around the state in making their voice heard.
Join us on October 28th and 29th in Waterville at the Annual Maine Broadband Summit to ensure how we won’t fail..
Please also review our newly revamped website @ www.mainebroadbandcoalition.org – check out the new library of resources AND please be sure to register on the “Members” page.
The time for Maine Legislators to commit to economic prosperity and community vitality in Maine is now. Literally now. Not in 3 years.
High speed, reliable internet is essential for any community, business, school, hospital, clinic, entrepreneur, farmer, mill, factory, coworking space, caretaker, restaurant or home office to function in our modern economy.
On Monday Governor Mills issued a proclamation on Monday (8.19.19) calling the legislature back to the State House for a special legislative session to consider a revised bond package. The special session is scheduled for Monday, August 26 at 10 a.m.
Included in the revised bond proposal is $15million for broadband infrastructure. According to the Governor’s press release – This bond will draw at least a 3/1 match in federal and private funding. What would an additional $50 million do for communities, businesses and residents around the state?
Or another way of thinking about it…what does it look like if we fail to invest in our future? What happens if you can’t upload your content? How will you check on a loved one from across the County? Do you really need to travel 4 hours just to see your doctor? Do your kids need to sit outside the Library just to download their homework assignments?
We can do better. Our Legislators hold the key right now. Please be sure to reach out to your local representatives and State senators and urge them to vote YES on the economic development bond that includes broadband.
*Join The Maine Broadband Coalition at the annual Maine Broadband Summit October 28 and 29 in Waterville. Save the date and get your tickets now.
By Nancy Smith: GrowSmart Maine
One of the most significant advances for broadband in Maine this year was a significant increase in operating funds for ConnectME. The recently passed budget included a change in the E- 911 assessment that is currently on phone bills. The current assessment of 45 cents per line will be split to 35 cents for E-911 and the remaining 10 cents for ConnectME. This change takes place in January of 2020 and will result in approximately $1.9 million in additional funds per calendar year, or an additional revenue stream of about $150,000 per month to ConnectME, starting in February of 2020. The PUC will re- evaluate the change assessment in January of 2022.
If a significant bond is passed by the legislature this year for broadband expansion, part of these new funds will be used to administer the bonds- including verification of applications, testing and monitoring of awardees. If a bond is not passed, ConnectME can use the funds to beef up our mapping and provide additional support to communities and ISP’s seeking to build out broadband in unserved parts of the state.
Another priority for this year is a significant bond issue to fund community-driven infrastructure investments. There were several legislative proposals to do this and the Governor included $30 million for broadband in the economic development portion of her comprehensive bond package. However, the legislature adjourned without passing any bond proposals. Discussions are continuing between the administration and the legislature, and if they can reach agreement, there may be a Special Session late summer or early fall to pass such a bond. Timing of when a broadband bond would be put before Maine voters would be determined as part of that process.
Note this summary reflects the final outcomes of bills as amended and finally passed.
LD 31 An Act Regarding Rules Adopted by the ConnectME Authority changed the designation of rules adopted by the ConnectME Authority from major substantive to routine technical. This will allow the Authority to better respond to changing technology while still ensuring appropriate public process.
LD 147 An Act To Extend Internet Availability in Rural Maine adds language to the law governing the telecommunications education access fund specifying that the use of the fund for Internet access includes mobile Internet access through a portable wireless access point, or hotspot, that provides Internet access over a cellular network. It does so within the existing funding structure.
LD 854 An Act To Improve Tax Incentives for Broadband Service expands the allowable use of tax increment financing to include development, expansion or improvement of broadband services, including connecting to broadband service outside the tax increment financing district and allows for such in residential areas within the municipality.
LD 1063 An Act To Support the Role of Municipalities in Expanding Broadband Infrastructure recognizes broadband Internet as a public necessity and designates a community broadband system or part of that system as a revenue-producing municipal facility. It allows a municipality to construct, maintain and operate a municipal or multi-municipal system composed of infrastructure capable of being utilized by communications service providers for the provision of communications services.
LD 1192 An Act To Establish Municipal Access to Utility Poles Located in Municipal Rights-of-way exempts a municipality from pole attachment fees to accommodate the municipality’s attaching its facilities for a governmental purpose consistent with the police power of the municipality or for the purpose of providing broadband service to an unserved or underserved area.
LD 1206 An Act Regarding Utility Poles in Public Rights-of-way adds language to the law governing the safety and convenience of highways, town ways and streets to specify that utility poles and facilities are not defects in the public way, in order to relieve municipal officials from liability for utility poles and facilities in the public way. The amendment also directs the Public Utilities Commission to report to the Joint Standing Committee on Energy, Utilities and Technology in January 2020 regarding actions the commission has taken to address issues related to abandoned utility poles and any associated facilities in the public right-of-way.
LD 1248 Resolve, To Direct the ConnectME Authority To Report on the Progress of the Detailed 2019-2021 Strategic Plan for Broadband Service in Maine incorporates within the ConnectME Authority annual report a progress update of the Authority in meeting the goals of its Detailed 2019-2021 Strategic Plan for Broadband Service in Maine.
LD 946 An Act To Protect the Privacy of Online Customer Information states that, with certain exceptions, a provider may not use, disclose, sell or permit access to a customer’s personal information unless the customer gives express, affirmative consent. The customer may revoke consent at any time. The provider may not refuse service to any customer withholding consent, nor may it charge a penalty or additional fee for the withholding of consent.
LD 1364 An Act Regarding Net Neutrality and Internet Policy prohibits a State agency from committing state funds to an Internet service provider (ISP) unless the ISP agrees to provide net neutral service in the provision of Internet service directly to the state entity or the provision of service across advanced communications infrastructure constructed with the use of state funds. For value in this for the typical internet user is that most ISPs want to do business with the State and access State funds to build and operate their networks, so most ISPs will effectively be required to abide by the network neutrality rules defined by the FCC.
LD 1371 An Act To Ensure Nondiscriminatory Treatment of Public, Educational and Governmental Access Channels by Cable System Operators makes several important changes to the franchise agreement between internet service providers and municipalities. It requires all cable system operators in the State to carry public, educational and governmental access channels on the basic cable or video service offerings or tiers and extends cable television service to rural areas by requiring all cable television franchises to provide line extensions with a minimum homes-per-mile requirement not to exceed 15 homes per mile.
LD 1517 An Act To Facilitate the Deployment of Small Wireless Facilities in Maine provides that a small wireless facility must be a permitted use within the public right-of-way while clarifying that small wireless facilities are subject to permits and permitting requirements and that this legislation does not alter a franchise agreement between a cable television company and a municipality.
In addition to these bills passed in the 2019 session, several are being held over until the Second Regular Session of the 129th Legislative Session beginning in January 2020.
LD 173 An Act To Promote Economic Development and Critical Communications for Family Farms, Businesses and Residences by Strategic Public Investment in High-speed Internet
LD 1163 An Act Regarding Energy, Utilities and Technology
LD 1563 An Act To Encourage the Development of Broadband Coverage in Rural Maine
Posted October 24, 2018
by Trevor Jones, OTELCO
Pumpkin Valley is a family owned farm in Dayton, ME and a proud OTELCO customer for over ten years. In 2002, the Harris family transformed their farm into a corn maze, and now every fall families come to get lost in their stalks.OTELCO took a trip to Dayton to check out the maze, and to talk to the family about how they use their OTELCO internet connection to run their business.
Keith Harris, who owns and runs the farm with his family, describes Pumpkin Valley as “a place where people can unplug.” Families can come and spend time together, getting lost in the maze and not in their phones. The maze itself is five acres, and even hosts a corn bridge to help lost travelers find their way out with a bird’s eye view.
Every year the Harris’s choose a fun theme for the maze. According to Keith, the Harris’ work with The Maize Co. each year to create the theme’s design, then they plow their cornfield into an intricate picture.
Keith’s favorite design, so far, is the first one, a big moose. This year the theme of the maze is the 25thAnniversary of the Professional Bull Riders. You could never tell from inside, but there is a giant bull mowed right into the maze.
The maze was just the beginning for Pumpkin Valley. Today the farm has over ten exciting activities for kids, and even grownups to enjoy. The newest addition to the farmyard is the Corn Pit. The corn pit is a large box filled with, literally, tons of corn kernels. Kids can take their shoes off and play in the corn, like a sandbox or ball pit but better!
Other fun activities in the farmyard include:
Getting lost in a corn maze works up quite the appetite, luckily Pumpkin Valley offers lots of delicious treats. Another new addition to the farm is their wood fire pizza. The pizza is cooked in a brick oven created by a local stone mason. No electricity or gas involved, just wood and fire.
If pizza isn’t what you’re looking for, don’t fret, Pumpkin Valley also offers:
For some, it may be hard to imagine why a pumpkin farm needs Internet, but just like any other business, the Internet is a vital part of the Harris’ operation. The farm uses their OTELCO Internet service for a lot of things, from running their website to sharing photos on their Instagram.
With their OTELCO connection, Keith is able to collaborate with other corn maze owners via online forums and Facebook groups. It is a small community, and the Internet makes it easier for them to find each other. They are able to share ideas, ask questions and solve problems, something they wouldn’t be able to do otherwise.
Most importantly, the Internet helps Pumpkin Valley Farm stay in contact with their customers. According to Keith, “having a presence online reduces phone calls for directions by 90%.” Freeing up him and his staff to focus on creating a fun-filled family farm.
OTELCO was created over a hundred years ago by rural farmers, like Keith Harris, who needed to bring phone service to their farms. Today, the company is proud to continue their tradition of serving the rural farmers of Maine.
Tradition is important to Keith Harris as well, which is why he likes to use local businesses he can depend on. The farm is full of local culture, from the apples they use in their cider, to the oven they cook their pizza in. That is why the Keith uses OTELCO “In today’s tech world you need uninterrupted service” says Keith. “OTELCO is great because they are small and local.”
By Fletcher Kittredge, CEO GWI
GWI wants to offer superior broadband to all Maine citizens and businesses. Superior broadband is very fast, very reliable, very secure, and affordable which means it is fiber-based broadband. We want to get gigabit+ fiber networks which we can use built to the whole towns, municipalities and counties. To use the networks we need to either own those networks or have the networks be open access, dark fiber networks. For that reason, we will help any municipality plan, design, fund, built, and operate their network as long as it is open access, dark fiber, because we can then rent fiber from the municipality to serve our customers in that town. Our willingness to work with towns is not pure altruism nor mysterious: on the most basic level we want to make sure a network we can use gets built. To reach that goal we are willing to open up our network and sell to our competitors. If we and the municipalities are both open access, then cooperating with municipalities means we can build a larger, more effective open market which then means the municipalities and GWI will sell more dark fiber (to our competitors).
On a less basic, more subtle level: what we are trying to do is create a world without monopolies and then do the best job at competing on a level playing field. To do a good job of competing we want to: a) get a keen understanding as to what the customers want, b) produce the most value from the network, and c) create a “brand of trust.” A “brand of trust” means our customers and potential customers believe we will treat them fairly. We think of it as being “the anti-cable company.” In a competitive market, if we earn a high level of trust then we will get our fair share of the market.
We also recognize that the community is a customer of a network independent of the individual consumers and businesses that make up that community. For example, if a town has universal fiber service so that the town’s school system can count on every student having very fast, very reliable, and very secure network access, then the school can teach students in new and wonderful ways. Another example: if the local healthcare providers can count on universal service, then superior healthcare can be delivered at lower cost in homes and businesses. Serving community needs creates great value in addition to the value of serving individual consumers and businesses.
We believe that by working closely with communities, we can build trust, understand the needs of the community, and get the information we need to make the best decisions on how to design the network. If we build the network ourselves and have the ability to work with the municipalities, we will do a better job. If the community builds the network and we are able to work with them, we have a higher degree of confidence that the community will build a network we can then rent to provide superior service.
Taking into account the communities we serve into our day-to-day decision making process is incredibly important to us and we hope to announce in the next several months a business initiative we are enormously proud of to demonstrate this commitment. Enabling open access, working together on digital inclusion so that all residents can afford access, and collaborating on digital literacy programs so that residents and businesses can make the most of the network are ways we will contribute to the vitality of the communities.
As we build infrastructure and networks, in order to make the network useful, we are very interested in the community’s opinions before and after the build; we don’t want to build a network no one uses. So over time we will ask for guidance from the citizens and communities. If a municipality has concrete plans to build a network we can use, we will not build in that town and will coordinate with that municipality to communicate the benefits of having open access networks. If a municipality or town is looking at us a partner to build a network, we will work with the citizens as we create an open access network for all. No matter what, we are part of a community and we are going to do this together.
In the first post in this series we detailed how the end of net neutrality had come and gone and how we hadn’t seen much of anything change yet. That’s in large part because a host of lawsuits and legislative battles are now rolling at a low boil. So where are we at now, more than two months in? Well, to simply thing just a bit, let’s just say that the future of Net Neutrality now lies with the House of Representatives.
A vote in the house would either re-instate the old rules or keep the repeal in place. But a vote doesn’t just happen. First, a petition in favor of making a vote happen must be signed by 218 members. As of right now, 176 have made their mark. So is it going to happen? Well, we all know how much politicians love to clearly and explicitly stick their necks out and choose a side.
But wait! There’s hope. Recently, Republican Mike Coffman of Colorado pulled an about-face, joining the fight to restore Net Neutrality—so it is possible.
What You Can Do:
1. In this contentious time, elected officials hear a lot about what they’re doing wrong. This is a rare chance for us Mainers to give certain representatives a big high five. Angus King and Chellie Pingree voted along party lines to support Net Neutrality. Susan Collins took bold and decisive action to do what’s right. Give her office a call to say thanks and express your support for Net Neutrality.
202-224-2523 | @SenatorCollins
2. Perhaps even more importantly, if you’re in Maine’s 2nd District, give Bruce Poliquin a call and let him know that you support a free and open Internet. Not in the 2nd? Give Susan Collins another call and tell her to tell him!
202-225-6306 | @RepPoliquin
At this point, you’re probably thinking one of two things:
a) Well jeez, I’m a GWI Internet customer and I’ll never have to deal with the repercussions of the Net Neutrality repeal because you guys have my back.
• That’s true. We’ll never block certain sites or apps, or otherwise control your internet experience. We also won’t even throttle your data to inhibit your access to certain types of content. Same goes for paid prioritization: making a slow, boggy internet the standard for anyone who doesn’t pay for premium services is not our style.
• Unfortunately, the repeal of Net Neutrality is all about allowing the big telecoms to get bigger and force the little independent guys like us out of the game all together.
b) I’m not a GWI customer, and a week into this whole “no more Net Neutrality thing” everything’s fine. I’m still streaming what I want, when I want and going to any site I want.
• Like giant tech companies, giant telecoms aren’t stupid. Remember when there used to be no ads on Facebook? How’s your feed looking today? Jammed with ads? Exactly. That didn’t happen overnight either. They’re just waiting until you let your guard down, then they’ll STRIKE.
Even if the House of Reps can’t get its act together and do what’s right, we still have a chance. Governors in six states—Hawaii, New Jersey, New York, Montana, Rhode Island, Vermont—have signed executive orders to protect Net Neutrality on a more local level. Three states—Oregon, Vermont, Washington—have also enacted legislation that in effect does the same thing.
Interested in what it’s going to take for Maine to do the same thing? Look for our next post in this series soon: Post 3: Hope for Net Neutrality at Home in Maine.
It’s official. The Federal Communications Commission’s repeal of Net Neutrality has been in effect–for a little more than two weeks.
Back in December, the FCC voted to repeal the rules that keep the internet fair and open. Since then, a long, murky process of votes, counter-votes and lawsuits has unfolded, leading us to… well—good question.
Technically, the repeal went into effect on June 11. Here’s what happened between December 14 and early June:
December 14, 2017: FCC vote
January 4, 2018: FCC’s “Restoring Internet Freedom Order” issued
January 2, 2018: Federal lawsuits filed against the FCC action by states, tech companies, public interest groups
May 16, 2018: Senate passes resolution to overturn FCC decision 52-47
June 11, 2018: Repeal takes effect
The FCC ended Net Neutrality, but the Senate overturned the ruling? Then why are there still lawsuits and why did the ruling still go into effect?
If you’re feeling confused, you’re in good company. This is where Democracy gets complicated. First off, once a ruling like this is set into motion, the ship is sailing. Lawsuits are great and all, but if they’re going to turn or stop the ship, it’s going to happen slowly. Like, s-l-o-w-l-y.
And yes, the Senate did overturn the FCC decision—thanks in large part to Senator Susan Collins of Maine. Collins broke ranks with her Republican colleagues, along with Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and John Kennedy of Louisiana, in voting to restore Net Neutrality.
In our next post in this series, you’ll be able to read more about what this kinda-sorta victory actually means for the future of Net Neutrality—nationally and right here at home in Maine.